Featured
Obama team accused of violating privacy laws to attack foes

The Obama administration may have skirted taxpayer privacy laws to attack its political opponents, according to a non-partisan watchdog group.

 

The Oct. 12 report, prepared by the staff of the Washington,
DC-based Cause of Action Institute, said the Obama administration has made
“frequent and damaging use of the IRS as a political weapon.”

 

But, the report said, the Obama White House is not the first
to do so, and recommended several changes to taxpayer privacy laws and regulations to prevent future
presidents from bending the rules in their favor.

 

The report also said the Obama administration has made
extensive use of Justice Department tax lawyers in the Office of White House
Counsel, including some who were directly involved in defending the IRS in
court against charges the agency illegally disclosed private tax information
for political purposes.

 

Cause of Action investigators looked at the legal barriers
that are supposed to keep presidents and their administrations from improperly
reviewing, and disclosing, private taxpayer information.

 

Under the Tax Reform Act of 1976, taxpayer information must
be kept confidential, and can only be revealed under limited circumstances. All
requests for review must be logged and recorded.

 

But, the report found, no president has ever used the two
disclosure mechanisms outlined in federal law.

 

A president can submit a written, personally signed request
to the Treasury secretary asking for specific information from an individual
tax return. The request must also state why the information is needed, and
specifically name whom else he intends to share the information with.

 

A second method, typically used to run checks on political
appointees, allows the Treasury Secretary to disclose portions of an
individual’s private tax information to designated White House personnel. But
the IRS must notify the taxpayer of the request for their information within
three days.

 

The president must also file a quarterly report to the
congressional Joint Committee on Taxation naming any individual whose tax
information has been requested, and the reasons why the request was made.

 

“No President has used either of these two pathways designed
by Congress to be the exclusive means for presidential access to confidential
taxpayer information,” Cause of Action investigators said.

 

Instead, individuals seeking a federal appointment have
signed consent forms giving the White House and other government agencies the
ability to glean whatever information they need from a tax return, all the
while avoiding any congressional reporting requirements.

 

The investigation also found that the Obama administration
has continually employed tax lawyers from the Department of Justice’s tax
division in its Office of White House Counsel.

 

“This practice raises concern that the Obama White House may
have recruited these tax attorneys in a further attempt to circumvent the
statutory limitations on presidential access to such information,” the report
said.

 

“President Obama wanted Tax Division lawyers,” investigators
said, because their jobs at the Department of Justice gave them access to
“confidential taxpayer information,” which the administration might then use
“to target its political enemies.”

 

The report said neither the White House Counsel’s Office nor
the Department of Justice had established “specific safeguards or ethics
screens” to prevent tax division attorneys from using private taxpayer
information they gleaned in court proceedings in their new White House roles.

 

The report said that two DoJ lawyers, Norah E. Bringer and
Andrew C. Strelka, worked in the White House Counsel’s Office after defending
IRS Commissioner John Koskinen in a lawsuit that alleged the IRS delayed an
application for nonprofit status by the group Z Street, Inc. on political
grounds.

 

Their roles in this, and other litigation, gave them access
to sensitive taxpayer information, the report said, which they may have used
and shared once they went to work in the White House.

 

In a written statement, a Justice Department representative
told AMI Newswire it “takes safeguarding confidential taxpayer information very
seriously.”

 

“The manner in which returns and return information is
accessed, reviewed, and disclosed by attorneys is governed by statute and
regulations. These requirements apply to every attorney while they are in
the Tax Division, on a detail within the Department or other places in the
government, and even after an attorney leaves federal service,” the
representative said.

 

The Cause of Action Institute report recommended that
Congress should reaffirm and strengthen taxpayer confidentiality rules, and
crack down on the use of consent forms that allow presidents to skirt existing
legal reporting requirements.

 

The report also called on the Department of Justice to
“ensure DoJ lawyers live up to the ethical standards expected of them and to
investigate allegations of misconduct.”

 

“Without legislative intervention and reform at the DOJ and
IRS,” the report said, “the President’s ability to misuse taxpayer information
will continue unabated.”

Thanks for being here and being a loyal reader. The American Media Institute covers stories other news outlets do not. We recruit reporters all over the world, investing money in translators, travel and document research. We are not a blog, which has few expenses beyond pajamas. Please help us continue to provide hard-hitting journalism by making a tax-deductible contribution today. Thank you.

Join the AMI Mailing List